How would you amend the Constitution?
If someone made Tim dictator-for-life, he has a (pretty good) list of amendments to implement.
As long as we are fantisizing, here's my list:
- Eliminate the Electoral college and elect the President by popular vote
- Have all Congressional districts nationwide drawn by a non-partisan commission (elimiate gerrymandering and "safe" districts)
- Allow the line-item veto by the Executive
- An explicit privacy amendment (let's do away with the penumbra crap and get this in plain text!)
- a human rights amendment. Unlike existing Federal statutes, I would word the amendment narrowly such that it prohibits governments (but not private citizens) from discrimination.
- A "fair use" amendment. Perhaps the only good way to stop the gradual mutation of intellectual property law into a straitjacket.
What I would not do:
- Proportional representation (it sounds good in theory, but I don't want the US to turn into Italy)
- Mess with the 2nd amendment...history and jurisprudence have managed to come up with a good balanced solution which protects the individual's right to bear arms but allows for individual states and cities to come up with policies appropriate for their areas.
- Make any change to war powers...the existing Constitution handles this properly. If Congress chooses to abrogate its role to the Executive, that is its own problem.
- Create a right to health care or any other "big government" idea. Those kind of things are best handled by statute, if the people and their representatives desire.
If someone made Tim dictator-for-life, he has a (pretty good) list of amendments to implement.
As long as we are fantisizing, here's my list:
- Eliminate the Electoral college and elect the President by popular vote
- Have all Congressional districts nationwide drawn by a non-partisan commission (elimiate gerrymandering and "safe" districts)
- Allow the line-item veto by the Executive
- An explicit privacy amendment (let's do away with the penumbra crap and get this in plain text!)
- a human rights amendment. Unlike existing Federal statutes, I would word the amendment narrowly such that it prohibits governments (but not private citizens) from discrimination.
- A "fair use" amendment. Perhaps the only good way to stop the gradual mutation of intellectual property law into a straitjacket.
What I would not do:
- Proportional representation (it sounds good in theory, but I don't want the US to turn into Italy)
- Mess with the 2nd amendment...history and jurisprudence have managed to come up with a good balanced solution which protects the individual's right to bear arms but allows for individual states and cities to come up with policies appropriate for their areas.
- Make any change to war powers...the existing Constitution handles this properly. If Congress chooses to abrogate its role to the Executive, that is its own problem.
- Create a right to health care or any other "big government" idea. Those kind of things are best handled by statute, if the people and their representatives desire.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home